20060724 Monday July 24, 2006

New Old Camera


New Old Camera
Originally uploaded by Berin Loritsch.
I bought a Super Ricohflex, which is an older Twin Lens Reflex (TLR) camera. The top lens is for focusing and the bottom lens is for picture taking. I was expecting a more hefty camera, but this one is fairly light. In fact I was very surprised at its size. As you can see by the picture the TLR is shorter than a Wacom tablet pen.

The Super Ricohflex has a limited set of applications it can be used for, and it likes doing things a little differently. The lens is a wide angle 80mm lens, and to be different they marked it as an 8cm lens. It has seven apertures marked in full stops ranging from f/3.5 to f/16. The most limiting part of the camera is the range of shutter times. It has six times marked: 1/200, 1/100, 1/50, 1/25, 1/10, and B (bulb). I have to have the right lighting conditions if I want to use the smaller apertures, which is not something that will take place in daylight. Since I like to use Provia slide film (a daylight balanced film), using it indoors will likely have a strong yellow or orange cast to it.

I'll report on picture quality when I get the pictures back tonight. It is a medium format camera, and uses 120 format film (6cm wide, 120mm long). It will fit 12 square pictures on the film.

While the controls do require some getting used to, particularly for someone spoiled by SLR cameras with all sorts of automatic gadgetry, it's really not that difficult to use. To focus, you pop up a hood on the top and look down. Because the picture is reflected up to you, your left to right directions on the viewfinder are reversed. That said, the hood also has a magnifying glass to assist with critical focus. Once you are done with the focusing, you can look down on the side of the upper lens to see how much depth of field you have. All in all, you can't complain about something as simple as this camera. (2006-07-24 07:22:42.0) Permalink Trackback Comments [2]


20060722 Saturday July 22, 2006

Feedback, It's What's for Dinner

I may be an odd fellow. As I learn something new, I always want to know its origins. Where did it come from and how does it make our lives better. As part of this natural pull, I recently bought a 50 year old Twin Lens Reflex (TLR) camera. It was my cheapest option to enter the world of medium format photography, which promises better resolution and more incredible pictures. I haven‘t gotten the pictures back from the developer yet, so I can‘t say if the claims are true for this camera. However, I‘ve made a few observations.

As cameras have progressed, we have more and more feedback available to us. In the beginning, cameras were made without meters and you had to go by the “Sunny 16” rule. Without boring you with details, the sunny 16 rule is a guide to base your exposure on. Many photographers still swear by it and won‘t bother with modern gadgetry. But as cameras evolved, and the bikini was introduced (the biggest boon to camera sales in history), more and more cameras came equipped with exposure meters. Now you had visual feedback that would tell you what you should already know (the Sunny 16 rule). Only thing is that meters could get fooled. They judge how bright the light is by comparing the average intensity with a medium gray (18% to be exact). If the picture had too much white or black, the meter would give you erroneous feedback. Which is part of the reason some photographers carry around a callibrated gray card with them.

Things progressed and we also got feedback on whether we were in focus or not (within a certain margin of error of course, we are dealing with machines). Now in the digital age, we have the ultimate feedback: the captured picture. More and more gadgetry thrown at the problem of how do we make beautiful pictures? The gadgets can‘t make beautiful pictures, but they can offer possible reasons why it didn‘t come out like you may have wanted. And that‘s the topic for today: feedback.

I have to say, with a good feedback system in a framework or application it is much easier to diagnose what might be happening. I‘ve worked on quite a few systems with feedback that ranged from console messages to live monitoring of a running system. In each system the feedback you got could point you in the wrong direction. It could send you on a wild goose chase. That can be very frustrating, particularly when you have people wanting some sort of answer and you are no closer to having one than you were when you started. The bottom line is that your feedback system can be fooled. Even if your feedback system includes the final result (such as a digital picture), it can‘t tell you why the technically correct picture didn‘t impress you. It can‘t tell you if one composition is stronger than another. Some things are left to the person to answer.

So if your monitoring system can be fooled, how can you trust it? What do you do if you can‘t trust your instruments? Pilots have to answer that question. An airplane has very sophisticated instruments, and a skilled pilot can fly a plane successfully without looking through any of the windows. The pilot can also tell if an instrument is out of whack because the instruments have instruments and warning lights. In the event of a complete failure of the monitoring system, the pilot has to actually pilot the plane. They have to make decisions based on what they can see from the cockpit. With software, we might feel like we are flying the Wright brother‘s plane or you might feel like you are flying the most advanced stealth bomber. Either way, we need to know a certain amount of information at a glance.

The problem for us software engineers is deciding what instruments actually help. How can we tell what is going on in a running system? What is the most telling metric? Is it memory consumption? It might tell us if there is a memory leak somewhere. What about average time to process a request? Well that might only be useful in development. In my experience, the best metrics are the ones that have a definite cause and effect relationship. If the metric looks like X then I need to do Y to fix the system. If I have a compilation error, I need to fix the syntax of my program. If a unit test fails, I need to fix my program. If I get a NullPointerException, no wait you don‘t still get those do you? :)

Even when you have a set of clean and distinct cause and effect type of meters built into your system, things can still go haywire. It‘s at those times that you have to step back and pull from old-school sensibilities. I may not be old school in age, but I am in spirit. Of course you go down the list of things that could possibly be an issue. The amount of data, the amount of traffic, possible sequences of events. Eventually you have to go outside the realm of common issues. In a military institution, the computers in the control tower would all go down at the same time twice a day. It wasn‘t until an embedded programmer noticed the radar making a full sweep and frying all the electronics in its path at the exact same time the computers went down that they found out what the problem was. Yes, the answer can be that bazar.

I have four cameras now. A digital, two 35mm film cameras, and an old medium format camera. Of them all, I am most comfortable with my high end 35mm camera. It has just the sensors I need, and it is very accurate most of the time. Out of the several hundred pictures I have taken with it, only a small percentage have been not so great. I have a lot of trust in what it can do, and because of it I have less trust in my starter 35mm camera. In fact, I have less trust of my digital point and shoot camera. Most of its pictures are overexposed, and the focus isn‘t as sharp as I‘d like. I‘ve been told that my vintage medium format camera can give me better results, but until I have any kind of real feedback I won‘t know for sure. It does encourage you to think more about what you are doing before you do it.

At the end of the day, the one thing that helps to understand and diagnose issues more than anything else is to shorten the feedback time. Once you have a quick feedback, you can decide how helpful it is. The longer it takes to try/fail/diagnose the more frustrated you become. Sometimes going without a modern convenience can really improve the system. Sometimes you can retrofit the modern convenience into the older design. No matter how quick your feedback system is, if you can‘t trust what it tells you then it is useless. You have to know what can fool the system and how to compensate for it. With cameras it is relatively easy because everyone has the same basic answers regardless of whether they are using Canon, Nikon, Kodak, Rollei, or Hasselblad. The only differences have to do with what buttons you press, but not the type of adjustments you are making. Software is not nearly so simple. Many times the same symptom points to completely different issues based on whether you are using Microsoft, Oracle, or IBM. It‘s this disconnect that makes it difficult to build a stronger community of common issues and solutions. Remember that community is just a larger system that needs feedback too.

(2006-07-22 22:44:11.0) Permalink Trackback


20060709 Sunday July 09, 2006

I'm back!

If you want to vacation in style, take a Disney cruise. It was awesome. Our meal servers were very attentive (even going so far as to remove chives from some ribs for my son), and there is nothing like not having to touch your luggage as it moves from resort to cruise to resort to the plane. I‘ve taken about 15 rolls of film which will need to wait until the 15th to get developed. This has been really fun.

(2006-07-09 19:34:49.0) Permalink Trackback


20060629 Thursday June 29, 2006

Going on Vacation

I‘ll be back in a bit over a week, but we are finally going on our long awaited 10th anniversary cruise. We have been looking forward to this for a long time. So don‘t expect any updates for a bit. When I get back there will be plenty of cool pics to share.

(2006-06-29 10:36:19.0) Permalink Trackback


20060626 Monday June 26, 2006

Using ActiveRecord for Export Purposes

In the main project we are working on, we have decided to cut our losses on a particular type of information we were gathering. Since a WIKI works just as well to house the information, and there really hasn‘t been any strong demand to mining the discrete information we have, we need to import our data into the WIKI. Luckily enough, Wikimedia (the software we are exporting to) has an export/import feature. That makes the process of generating uniform records relatively painless. The only catch is that we have to pull the data out of our database and into the WIKI format.

Since I love the ease of use of working with Rails, I decided to take the most useful parts and use them in my export wizard. The database is Microsloth‘s SQL Server, but thankfully there is an ADO bridge for Ruby. The ODBC bridge doesn‘t seem to work (memory issues), so do a search for using SQL Server with ActiveRecord. In fact the two parts that I am using from Rails is ActiveRecord and ERB integration. For ActiveRecord, I only need to configure the database connection and set up the model objects.

The database I am working with is an ugly hack that was once redesigned, and then because of schedule issues the redesign was scrapped. Naturally I could not use the golden path for ActiveRecord. However, that really isn‘t a huge problem because I can call set_table_name and set_primary_key to override those defaults. The trick is that I need to require all the ruby files in the models directory. Right now that is being done manually, but I aught to make it more robust.

Getting ERB working was probably the most fun. The source code below is the short form of what I needed to do:

require 'erb'
template_file = IO.read('views/page.rxml')
template = ERB.new(template_file)
Person.find(:all).each do |person|
@person = person
puts template.results
end

The results method re-evaluates the template into a rendered string each time. The real action performed here will be to output that string to a file. The cool bit is that the details of what the thing looks like can be manipulated easily in the views/page.rxml file. Because everything centers around that one central Person record, I don‘t have to add new variables for the embedded Ruby interpreter to use.

The approach I‘m taking is fun, so that helps make the task less of a pain. The really cool thing is that I whipped together the core framework in a couple of hours. The only real challenge is getting the models to relate to each other because of the poor design. Without intending to, ActiveRecord even made one of my tables polymorphic — something that was really the true intention of that table. This pretty much rocks.

(2006-06-26 23:28:47.0) Permalink Trackback


20060621 Wednesday June 21, 2006

Taste and See...


Taste and See...
Originally uploaded by Berin Loritsch.
Stenciling gone right. I shot Provia 100 in our kitchen, metering off of the new design work in our kitchen. I must say that I am impressed with the dynamic range available in Provia. The colors are very natural, and it almost has a National Geographic feel to it. (2006-06-21 23:03:06.0) Permalink Trackback


Inherent Risk with Single Sign-On

At the time I am writing this, the Yahoo! single sign-on service is down. Completely down. No hope of logging in at all. In many sites, all that means is that you can‘t access your service but you can get other work done. In this case, I can‘t log in to Flickr, or access any of the other yahoo services. It‘s incredibly frustrating. The worst part is, I don‘t know who to notify or yell at. There is no indication that Yahoo! knows what is going on or is doing anything about it.

The risk is self-evident. Users are held hostage by the single sign-on service. Sure you have the convenience of signing in one time and then being able to go from place to place… Sort of. With Yahoo! and Flickr, you have to sign in again because the cookie has to be set at the domain level, and Flickr has its own domain. It‘s definitely less than ideal.

(2006-06-21 09:45:41.0) Permalink Trackback Comments [2]


20060616 Friday June 16, 2006

Zen: The Art of Disconnecting?

I spent more time contemplating why it is that I like the analog more than digital. I have a lot of time on my commute so thoughts just come bubbling up as I ride home. Then I thought of different arts where the principles of Zen are traditionally applied: flower arranging, gardening, sword polishing, martial arts, painting, haiku, and tea ceremonies. There is a common thread among the ideals in all of these disciplines. It‘s the practice of disconnecting your conscious mind and allowing your subconscious mind to surface. When you combine that with the modern theories on how our brains work, it makes an incredible amount of sense.

Our brains need rest, just like our bodies do. To much active thought can cause you burnout, stress, and/or panic. When you develop your own film, it does not require much in the way of active thought. When you have your workspace properly arranged, you only need to watch the clock to know when to agitate or change chemicals. After you‘ve done it a couple times, you have now carved out 20-30 minutes where your brain can dissengage from active thought and allow your passive thought to surface. The mind wanders all over the place. Sometimes it dwells on a moment of beauty that you saw and different aspects of that moment come to light. Other times it dwells on whatever challenge you were facing that day, and unique aspects come to light. In short, doing something physically repetitive that does not require too much active thought frees you to be creative.

At some point you may have a moment where your passive thought resonates with your active thought. A unique and creative approach to solve a hard problem. A way to bring more out of a picture. A small change to maximize beauty. Some people call it a “Zen“ moment, others call it a “Eureka!” moment, either way it would not come to the surface if your active mind is engaged all the time.

For thought professionals like us developers and designers, this underscores the need for us to walk away at the end of the day. Powering through a tough problem forces you down the wrong path. Allowing all the stuff you are dealing with to fall into the background helps your brain sort out all the information it has to deal with. You can see the path you couldn‘t see before. It‘s not mystical, it‘s the way we are wired.

(2006-06-16 10:19:56.0) Permalink Trackback Comments [2]


20060615 Thursday June 15, 2006

Analog vs. Digital

Last night I upgraded my zoom lens, bought film, and got harassed for not having a digital SLR. I know the ACE Photo people mean well, but I still love film. It's largely for the same reason that I love analog tape more than straight to digital. It's that factor of quality . I know the strengths and weaknesses of each medium. Yet, I like my results better with an analog front end than with a digital front end.

Digital is accurate, but it is not real . It is a quantized version of reality. Over time technology has given us more and more accurate representations of reality to the point where it is almost undiscernable. So why is it that I still prefer film and tape for the beginning of my work flow? One could argue in the case of film that if you apply the right ICC profile and such you can simulate the film. You could also argue that in the case of tape, it is just a combination of EQ and compression. Nevertheless, in both cases, you know exactly what you want and all you have to do is put in the right media.

There is another reason for preferring the analog processing for the beginning stages: softer saturation characteristics. When you over-saturate a film, you can rescue more than you can when you over-saturate your digital capture. Film gives a little more. The same goes for tape — even more so. When you over-saturate your tape to the point of distortion, the sound is more pleasing than digital.

Finally, as smooth and clear as DSLR cameras have become, there is an element of soul (deep feeling) that is lost. Digital is much more sterile feeling than the rawness of analog. Much of it is due to the absence of noise. Sometimes that is what you want, but many times you have a much better emotional response to the analog medium. Why do you think many audiophiles insist on vinyl records instead of compact discs? There is a better visceral feel to the realness of analog than the sterility of digital.

So, what does that mean for software? Isn‘t the medium we are working with purely digital? Well, yes and no. It all starts with people. People tell machines what to do and the machines respond. Some applications do a better job than others with this. The question is, how analog are you ? Have you fallen into the trap of thinking like a machine or do you vigilently protect your humanness? What you create depends on who you are internally. If you are sterile inside, then you will create sterile things — applications or “art”. If you are alive inside, your creations will be alive. Sometimes you have to leave the sanitarium :)

(2006-06-15 09:14:29.0) Permalink Trackback Comments [1]


20060613 Tuesday June 13, 2006

Developing Film is Fun for the Whole Family

Ok, so maybe that‘s an exaggeration. However this is a way that my daughter and I get to bond. She is a very creative soul, and in the lower elementary has written several of her own books (illustrated and bound by her). She even has a series with a recurring character. Of course the distribution for her works of art is rather small right now being my wife and I. Since I have been picking up photography as a hobby, and started developing my own film to cut down costs, I figured we might be able to share the joy of developing film together.

Typically it is not a good idea to let young kids play with chemicals, so I take care of mixing the chemicals and putting the film on the spiral and in the tank. Last night, as she saw I was starting to develop a couple rolls from graduation, she exclaimed “I want to pour!“ With proper supervision she is fairly careful so I let her pour the developer, stop, and fixer at the proper stages. She also took care of agitating the developer. That‘s saying something because the pushed TMax took 21 minutes to develop. She was involved the whole time.

My wife upon seeing the two of us develop the film commented, “My two geeks :)” She likes seeing the pictures, and she prefers to see the finished product in hand. She can‘t stand the develop only that I do. I wonder how I‘m going to break it to her that I‘m using slide film for the cruise in a couple weeks. I don‘t think the place I use does reversal printing, but even if they do it would be very expensive to get the whole roll done.

(2006-06-13 09:20:10.0) Permalink Trackback